Families in Baghdad, April 28 2015:… it is very confusing to hear that Rajavi is going to testify against Islamic State since she has always supported them as well as the remains of the Saddam regime – whose head Al Douri was killed in Tikrit recently. Maryam Rajavi refers to Islamic State as “Revolutionary Sunni Tribes”. In fact …
Dear Ted Poe please ask Maryam Rajavi to open the gates of Camp Liberty and release our loved ones
Open Letter to Congressman Ted Poe
[This letter was sent to Iran Interlink for publication by the families who are in Baghdad]
We are families whose loved ones remain trapped in Camp Liberty in Iraq and of course we follow events which take place in and around the camp with great interest. We were very happy to discover therefore that you have organised a meeting in Congress to discuss this very issue. We thank you warmly for the work you are doing to focus attention on Camp Liberty and the possible danger posed to the residents by Islamic State in Iraq.
We write to appeal for your help because you are friends with Maryam Rajavi and it appears that only she can help us and our loved ones.
Since 2003 many families have travelled at least once to Baghdad in an attempt to meet with our loved ones. We have mostly not had any contact with them for at least two decades. The fall of Saddam Hussein gave us hope that we could at last visit them. Sadly, this has not been made possible though we have never been given a plausible reason why.
We should remind you at this point that our lives in Iran have not been easy as relatives of MEK members. As we are sure you know, the Mojahedin Khalq are hated by the older generation in Iran for their cooperation with Saddam Hussein during the eight year war, and because of waging a terrorist campaign against Iran which indiscriminately killed thousands of ordinary citizens. Families of MEK members face hostility and prejudice which makes our lives doubly difficult. Fortunately, hardly anybody under the age of thirty has even heard of the group or its leaders, so the old hatred is being put to rest and we are beginning to find peace among our neighbours and work colleagues.
However, we still suffer greatly because we cannot make contact with our loved ones. We are not even entirely certain whether they are alive or not as we have had no news of them for many years and sometimes the names given to the UN do not match the identity of the person. Individuals can easily be made to disappear in this situation. We hear constantly of residents falling sick and not getting adequate medical attention and of course we would like to be able to care for them, but most families are not even told until it is too late and their loved one has died. Even then we are not able either to take them home for burial or visit their grave inside the camp.
UNAMI officials are sympathetic to our plight, as are Iraqi officials responsible for the camp. Unfortunately, they have been unable to persuade the MEK to allow us to talk with our loved ones. We write letters and send gifts, but whether we deliver them at the gate of the camp for the Iraqi guards to send in or whether they are sent via the Red Cross, they are returned to us.
In some cases elderly parents have died before being reconciled with their children. In other cases, the children of MEK members who were left behind in the 1980s have grown up without their parents, being cared for by relatives. As time goes on, the situation becomes more painful and difficult. We will do anything to meet with our loved ones. We are prepared to visit them inside Camp Liberty under MEK supervision, simply to satisfy ourselves that they are well.
What makes it worse is that we know that our loved ones face great danger in the MEK camp. The longer the MEK remain in Iraq against the decision of the government, the greater the danger they are in. The history of the MEK in Iraq means it does not have many friends or supporters in that country. The MEK camps have been attacked on several occasions and too many have been killed. Our greatest hope is that your efforts to highlight this situation will help to make it easier and quicker for the residents to be removed to safety.
We are aware that the Iraqi authorities have made provision to remove the residents from Camp Liberty and accommodate them in secure hotels and apartments where they will be safe from attack. However, the MEK leaders have not agreed to this plan.
With the terrible activities of Islamic State in Iraq we are afraid our loved ones are in great danger and if Islamic State is able to get close to the camp we believe that the camp’s residents would all be killed. Everyone we talk with says that Islamic State is a threat to Shias and to Iranians in particular.
In spite of this, it is very confusing for us to hear that Maryam Rajavi is going to testify against Islamic State since she has always supported them as well as the remains of the Saddam regime – whose head Al Douri was killed in Tikrit recently. Maryam Rajavi refers to Islamic State as “Revolutionary Sunni Tribes”. In fact Maryam Rajavi says that we families are threatening her people in Camp Liberty. She has accused us of being “agents of the Iranian Intelligence ministry” and “agents of the Sepah Qods” and has accused us of coming to Baghdad to “massacre” the camp residents. Why would any of us want to hurt our family members? If Maryam Rajavi actually knew what was happening at Camp Liberty she would see that we are ordinary people. Many of us are elderly or middle aged. She cannot possibly believe that we want to or are even capable of hurting our own family members.
We plead with you therefore to ask Maryam Rajavi on our behalf to intervene and change this situation. We are informed by the UNAMI officials that she could change this situation ‘with a phone call’. Please ask her to make that call and allow the people in Camp Liberty to take refuge in safer accommodation immediately and, above all, to meet with their families as soon as possible.
On behalf of the families of Camp Liberty residents – Baghdad
Mujahadeen-e-Khalq (MEK). Backgrounders
Council of Foreign Relations, July 29 2014: … As tens of thousands gathered for an annual rally for the NCRI in France in June 2014, a spokesman for the French Foreign Ministry condemned the group for its “violent and non-democratic inspirations,” “cult nature,” and “intense campaign of influence and disinformation.” …
Mujahadeen-e-Khalq (MEK). Backgrounders
Author: Jonathan Masters, Deputy Editor
Updated: July 28, 2014
The People’s Mujahedeen of Iran, more commonly known as the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq or MEK, is a controversial Iranian resistance group; it was once listed as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) by the United States for its alleged killing of U.S. personnel in Iran during the 1970s, and for its ties to former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. Recognizing the group’s rejection of violence, the State Department delisted the MEK in late 2012 but voiced ongoing concerns about its alleged mistreatment of its members.
The MEK helped Islamists overthrow the Western-backed Shah in 1979, but broke violently with the clerics shortly after the revolution and were forced into exile in France in 1981. The group moved its base of operations to eastern Iraq in 1986, but in recent years the pro-Iranian government of Nouri al-Maliki has pushed for the exiled group to relocate. In mid-2014, some 3,000 MEK members resided at Camp Hurriya (Liberty) near Baghdad, awaiting resettlement to third countries.
Roots of Resistance
The MEK was founded in 1965 by leftist Iranian students opposed to the monarchy of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and its supporters in the West, including the United States. Many of the MEK’s most influential founding members—including leader Massoud Rajavi—were imprisoned by the Shah in the 1970s, and several were executed.
Throughout the decade, the MEK orchestrated terrorist attacks against the state that killed several Americans working in Iran, including military officers and civilian contractors, according to the U.S. State Department. (By 1978, some 45,000 of the 60,000 foreigners working in Iran were Americans.) The MEK denies any involvement with these incidents, asserting that they were the work of a breakaway Marxist-Leninist faction, known as Peykar, which hijacked the movement after the arrest of Rajavi.
Some analysts support this. “Rajavi, upon release from prison during the revolution, had to rebuild the organization, which had been badly battered by the Peykar experience,” said Patrick Clawson, director of research at the Washington Institute, in a CFR interview.
The MEK participated in the 1979 revolution that swept Ayatollah Khomeini into power, but refutes U.S. government claims that it also supported the hostage-taking raid on the U.S. Embassy in November of that year. “Though denied by the MEK, analysis based on eyewitness accounts and MEK documents demonstrates that MEK members participated in and supported the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and that the MEK later argued against the early release [of] the American hostages,” said a 2011 State Department report on terrorism.
Experts say MEK’s ideology—initially a blend of Marxism, feminism, and Islamism—as well as its popular support in the initial post-revolutionary period put it at odds with the new clerical regime, which cracked down violently on the potential political rival. The mullahs arrested and executed thousands of Mujahedeen, who retaliated by assassinating dozens of senior government officials, including the president and prime minister in August 1981, according to the U.S. State Department. The month prior, Rajavi established in Tehran the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), also known as the MEK’s “parliament in exile,” but he and the group’s leadership were quickly driven into exile in Paris.
Support for Saddam
In 1986, the government of Jacques Chirac expelled Rajavi and much of the MEK as part of a deal with Tehran that freed French hostages held by pro-Iranian groups in Lebanon. According to the U.S. State Department, the MEK was then welcomed into Iraq, where it supported Saddam Hussein’s war against Iran (1980-88) and reportedly helped quash Kurdish uprisings in the north and Shia unrest in the south (1991). Saddam armed the MEK near the end of the Iran conflict “with heavy military equipment and deployed thousands of MEK fighters in suicidal, mass wave attacks against Iranian forces.” Iran’s Revolutionary Guards killed some two thousand MEK in the ill-fated assault known as Operation Eternal Light. (The MEK denies any role in the suppression of Kurdish and Shiite unrest in Iraq in 1991.)
The MEK’s campaign against the Islamic Republic, including multiple targeted attacks on high-ranking officials, continued throughout the 1990s and early 2000s. The group demonstrated its global reach in April 1992 with coordinated raids on diplomatic missions in ten countries, including the Iranian Mission to the United Nations in New York. (The MEK said that the attacks were retaliation for Iranian air strikes on the group’s base outside Baghdad.) In 2003, French police arrested more than 150 MEK members for allegedly plotting and financing terrorist attacks. The EU had labeled the MEK a terrorist organization the prior year (it was delisted in 2009). The Iranian government blames the MEK for the deaths of more than 12,000 Iranians over the past three decades.
Searching For a New Home
As part of the 2003 invasion, U.S. forces initially attacked MEK military targets in Iraq despite the group’s claims of neutrality. The two sides eventually negotiated a cease-fire that disarmed MEK members and confined them to Camp Ashraf, a 14-square-mile former Iraqi military base in the country’s northeast. In 2004, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld designated the group as civilian “protected persons” under the Geneva Convention—a designation that ran against the recommendations of the U.S. Department of State, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and the International Committee of the Red Cross.
According to a 2009 RAND report, the decision was “extremely controversial because it appeared that the United States selectively chose to apply the Geneva Conventions to a designated terrorist organization and, further, to grant it special status.” That designation expired after Iraq regained full sovereignty in January 2009.
The MEK had long feared that a transition to Iraqi control of Ashraf (PDF) would result in their eviction. As U.S. forces pulled out of Ashraf in April 2011, violence broke out between the Iraqi military and camp residents. Thirty-five MEK were killed, according to the UN. After the incident, Iraq reiterated its vow to close Ashraf following full U.S. withdrawal at the end of 2011.
Iraq and the UN reached an agreement with MEK in December of that year that would relocate Ashraf residents to Camp Liberty outside Baghdad, a “temporary transit station” from which group members could eventually be taken in by other countries. As of May 2014, approximately 3,000 MEK members resided at Camp Hurriya (Liberty), near Baghdad, awaiting resettlement to third countries.
Leadership & Ideology
The MEK has long been led jointly by husband-and-wife team Massoud and Maryam Rajavi, and is reputedly the largest militant Iranian opposition group committed to the overthrow of the Islamic Republic. It is also “the only army in the world with a commander corps composed mostly of women,” said former CFR press fellow Elizabeth Rubin. Maryam Rajavi joined the resistance as a student in Tehran in the early 1970s and, at the behest of her husband, assumed joint control of the group in 1985. Feminism and allegiance to the Rajavi family are pillars of MEK ideology, which was founded on both Islam and Marxism—though the group has denied its affiliation with the latter.
Many analysts, including Rubin, have characterized the MEK as a cult, citing the group’s fealty to the Rajavis. Older women were reportedly required to divorce their husbands in the late 1980s, and younger girls cannot marry or have children.
The NCRI elected Maryam Rajavi as “Iran’s future president” in 1993 and, according to the group’s website, expects to oversee a six-month democratic transition in Iran “once the mullahs are toppled.” Based out of Paris, she also serves as the group’s chief international ambassador. NCRI’s political platform includes support for human rights, women, capitalism, religious freedom, minority rights, and Iran’s integration into the global community.
Massoud Rajavi disappeared following the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003; his whereabouts and current status are unknown. Some analysts believe he is dead. “Cult leaders generally don’t retire,” said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, in a CFR interview. “They either die or go to prison. I’d be surprised if Massoud Rajavi is still alive.”
Size & Support Structure
The U.S. State Department, in an August 2011 report, put MEK global membership between 5,000 and 10,000, with significant contingents in Paris and other European capitals where the group maintains offices.
The group operates a well-funded, highly sophisticated network of advocates in the United States, enlisting in recent years the support of dozens of high-profile officials from both political parties, including former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani and former governors Edward Rendell and Howard Dean. Much of this advocacy was centered on a campaign to delist the MEK as a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization. In September 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton removed the group from the FTO list and thereby unfroze the MEK’s U.S. assets and allowed it to transact with U.S. entities. The NCRI opened a Washington, DC, office in April 2013.
Prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Saddam was the MEK’s primary financier, experts say. But in recent years, the group claims to rely on the largesse of wealthy Iranian expatriates in the United States and Europe, and others opposed the clerical regime in Tehran.
The debate over the MEK’s legitimacy as a peaceful Iranian resistance group has attracted both critics and supporters over the years. The group’s advocates assert that Secretary of State Madeleine Albright listed the MEK as a foreign terrorist group in October 1997 as part of a diplomatic effort to open dialogue with moderates in Tehran. Some reporting at the time attests to this. “One senior Clinton administration official said inclusion of the People’s Mujahedeen was intended as a goodwill gesture to Tehran and its newly elected moderate president, Mohammad Khatami,” wrote Norman Kempster in the LA Times.
Some Western backers believe the group serves as a strategic counterweight to the clerical regime in Iran. Writing in The Hill in 2014, Raymond Tanter, president of the Iran Policy Committee, a Washington, DC-based advocacy group, argued that MEK “dissidents [in Camp Liberty] have historic ties in the area that can help tilt the balance against radical Sunnis and counter an extremist ‘Shiite arc’ of Tehran and its counterpart in Damascus.”
Critics of the MEK question the group’s motives and commitment to nonviolence and human rights. The State Department noted such reservations upon delisting the group in September 2012: “With today’s actions, the Department does not overlook or forget the MEK’s past acts of terrorism…The Department also has serious concerns about the MEK as an organization, particularly with regard to allegations of abuse committed against its own members.”
As tens of thousands gathered for an annual rally for the NCRI in France in June 2014, a spokesman for the French Foreign Ministry condemned the group for its “violent and non-democratic inspirations,” “cult nature,” and “intense campaign of influence and disinformation.”
Others believe Western support for the MEK distracts from or, worse, undercuts the efforts of more mainstream Iranian opposition groups like the Green Movement, which assembled millions of peaceful protestors in the aftermath of the disputed 2009 presidential election.
This CFR backgrounder explores Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.
This CFR Crisis Guide provides an in-depth, multimedia look at Iran’s history, its evolution as an Islamic Republic, and its controversial nuclear program.
This study by RAND’s National Defense Research Insitute examines the unique detention issues that arose from MEK’s capture in Iraq by U.S.-led coalition forces in 2003.
Mojahedin Khalq (MKO, MEK, NCRI, Rajavi cult) only to
LOBBY for the murderers of their servicemen
Mazda Parsi, Nejat Bloggers, June 24 2014: …While the current crisis in Iraq is in the spotlight of the International Community, the issue of the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (the MKO) seems trivial. However, authentically the MKO plays the part of an old buzzard who feed on dispute and conflict. If there is no conflict in the region and/or between Iran and the West …
Iran Interlink, June 12 2014: … An article published on the Mojahedin Khalq’s official website exposes the group’s affinity with the gruesome Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) in Iraq. The first page of their site (see picture below) says in Farsi, “Revolutionary forces in Iraq have captured parts of Mosul after fighting with Maliki’s forces”. Referring to …
Habilian Association, June 09 2014: … In his latest statement, the ringleader of Mujahedin-e Khalq terrorist group expressed his solidarity with the Jaish-ul-Adl terrorist group. Referring to the execution of 16 men affiliated to Jaish-ul-Adl terrorist group, Masoud Rajavi, whose whereabouts are unknown since the US invasion of Iraq, described them as their “brothers …