Ali Akbar Rastgou and Davood. B. Arshad, November 19 2016:… As we have heard from the ranks of the MEK-outs in France, you are invited to the international gathering of the Peoples Mojahedin of Iran “Mojahedin-e Khalq” (MEK / PMOI / MKO) and its political arm, the “National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)” on November 26th in Paris. We urge you to refrain from participating in this event! The MEK is …
Open letter from Ali Akbar Rastgou to Mr. Axel Fischer
Vice-President of the Parliament Assembly and the Council of Europe and Chairman of the EPP Group
Dear Mr. Fischer,
As we have heard from the ranks of the MEK-outs in France, you are invited to the international gathering of the Peoples Mojahedin of Iran “Mojahedin-e Khalq” (MEK / PMOI / MKO) and its political arm, the “National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)” on November 26th in Paris.
We urge you to refrain from participating in this event!
The MEK is a cult organization being in fire for serious human rights violations against their members (according to a HRW-report) and the dubious handling of critics and dropouts.
Especially the refugees from CampLiberty in Iraq, who were relocated to Albania, are especially in the focus of the leadership of the organization to be influenced. The MEK tries everything to keep their members in Albania under control and to prevent their integration in society outside the organization.
In recent years due to its dubious reputation the MEK strives intensively to international political appreciation. They call themselves “the Iranian Resistance”, but within the serious political opposition groups inside Iran, they do not matter. They are also despised by the majority of the Iranian people for their cooperation with the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. The “Third Way” – the overthrow of the political system inside Iran by the Iranian people and their organized resistance (the MEK) – propagated by Rajavi, is utopian for that reason alone, the MEK has virtually no support among the Iranian people.
The assertion the MEK can be a serious alternative to the current Iranian regime, is merely the wishful thinking of the MEK and its lobbyists.
That’s why they are trying to misuse the media for their own purposes deliberately and to spread their view of reality in the international media.
Also the removal from the US list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations in 2012 was not a political development but the result of a multi-million dollar public relations- and media campaign of the MEK. Both in Iraq, as well as in the US, the MEK tries to place lobbyists in major media in order to influence the reporting.
The Gathering simply is a propaganda event for the MEK themselves and their “President elected” Maryam Rajavi. It is all about to enhance the MEKs international reputation and to interfere with the rapprochement course towards the Western world and Iran.
Even as a well-intentioned humanitarian gesture for the members of the MEK, your participation in this event would be counterproductive, because the simple members are the first who have to suffer from an appreciation of the MEK.
Your participation in this event as Vice-President of the Parliament Assembly and the Council of Europe, nor benefits the people of Iran, neither the MEK members living in Albania. The only one who would benefit from your participation, are Mrs. Maryam Rajavi and her MEK leadership!
With best regards,
AAWA Association e.V.
Dipl. Ing. Ali Akbar Rastgou (Chairman)
November 19th 2016
Open letter of Davood. B. Arshad to Axel. E. Fisher
MdB Mr. Axel E. Fischer
The Honorable MdB Mr. Fischer
I am Davood Arshad a Human Rights Activist. I am active in NTCA registered in Cologne which is dedicated to improving the lives of individuals and families affected by Islamist terrorist cult organizations, and also increase the public awareness on how terrorist organizations are established, recruit members, and hide their barbaric nature in the West and their real Goals thereof.
As ex-members of Mek (Mujahidin-e Khalg Iran) for 3 decades, also ex-member of National Council of Resistance of Iran, I would like to discuss some important issues that affect the fighting terrorism.
Any cooperation with Mek with terrorist background damages the reputation of the politicians within their electoral.
Among our issues are the following:
Brief description of how;
Western educated members like us are recruited by terrorist organizations.
How young members are utilised to take up arms and spread terror.
The goals of Mek in doing so and their long term strategy against the western civilization.
Their tactics in reaching their goals.
Answer any question with regards to this issue.
Attached are some facts about MEK’s previous activities around the Globe.
Thank you for considering this meeting request. I look forward to hearing from you.
Davood B. Arshad
No to Terrorist-cults Movement
MdB Mr. Axel E. Fischer
Saudi beheading – Myanmar woman screams innocence before execution
European MEK Supporters Downplay ISIS Role in Iraq (aka Mojahedin Khalq, MKO, NCRI, Rajavi cult)
European MEK Supporters Downplay ISIS Role in Iraq (aka Mojahedin Khalq, MKO, NCRI, Rajavi cult)
While the world watched in horror as jihadist extremists from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) seized the Iraqi city of Mosul, some members of the European Parliament (MEPs) claimed that these actions were not carried out by ISIS, but were “part of a popular uprising” against Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
At the same time that ISIS was reportedly committing mass executions in Mosul, these MEPs “disputed” that Mosul and Tikrit had been taken by ISIS, and announced the creation of the European Iraqi Freedom Association (EIFA), a “new NGO with the mission of improving the political and human rights situation in Iraq.”
The comments were made at a June 11 press conference in Brussels, according to a press releasefor the event.
The ousting of Maliki and the “complete eviction of the Iranian regime from Iraq” are the group’s primary goals, according to the press release of the EIFA, which has no website other than a Facebook page that was created on May 6.
There is no shortage of people arguing that Iran holds excessive influence over Iraq and that Maliki has aggravated many of Iraq’s problems, so why did these MEPs resort to downplaying the horrors of ISIS’ actions in calling for an end to Tehran’s hold on Baghdad?
A clue appears in the EIFA’s emphasis on the security situations of Camps Ashraf and Liberty.
Camp Ashraf became the Iraqi base of the exiled Iranian dissident organization, the Mujahedin-e Khalq, (aka MEK, MKO, PMOI and NCRI), in the 1980s after its exodus from the Islamic Republic following a power struggle and violent regime-orchestrated persecution.
Despite its expensive claims to the contrary (MEK op-eds and advertisements regularly appear in Western media outlets), the NCRI, the MEK’s “parliament-in-exile” and political wing, has no popular support in Iran. In fact, the MEK sided with Saddam Hussein during the 1981-88 Iran-Iraq war and even attempted to take Iranian territory. The vast majority of Iranians inside Iran either consider the group insignificant or harmful to reformist efforts. The MEK is also despised by many Iraqis for its role in crushing Shia and Kurdish uprisings against Saddam’s dictatorial rule. Yet thanks to well-funded lobbying and advocacy efforts, the MEK has still been endorsed by some Western politicians in the US and Europe as a legitimate Iranian opposition movement.
Before setting its sights on the United States, the MEK, through the NCRI, embarked on a well-organized campaign to bring European politicians to its side. After years of unchecked lobbying efforts, the MEK has convinced some MEPs to advocate in its favor. In addition to the leftist groups who uncritically support the MEK because it claims to have Marxist beliefs (along with Islamic ones!), right-wing MEPs seem taken in by its fervent anti-Iranian government stance. It is therefore not surprising that the individuals endorsing the EIFA have also endorsed the MEK.
The foremost MEK-EIFA endorser is Struan Stevenson, a British conservative who chaired the European Parliament (EP) delegation for relations with Iraq in 2009-2014. Under his watch, the delegation has devoted disproportionate attention to the security of Camp Ashraf while almost completely neglecting the more relevant economic, social, security and human rights challenges facing Iraq. When the EP negotiated a 2014 resolution addressing the surge of violence in Iraq in February, Stevenson made every effort to downplay the involvement of ISIS, while directing all blame towards Maliki and Iran.
Another notable promoter of the EIFA is Alejo Vidal-Quadras, a Spanish conservative. During his tenure as Vice President of the EP (2009-14), he functioned as one of the NCRI’s chief supporters. The EIFA has also been endorsed by former Portuguese socialist MEP Paulo Casaca (2004-09), a self-styled “expert on Iraq” who reportedly employed a MEK member as one of his personal assistants during his parliamentary stint.
Seen in the light of their MEK connections, it’s clear why these MEPs are trying to downplay the role of ISIS as a serious threat to the stability of Iraq and the broader region. The MEK and its supporters view Maliki as an Iranian pawn and believe that if Maliki goes, the Iranian government (which the MEK detests) will suffer. So in following the proverb, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”, the MEK’s supporters and ISIS have found a common cause in pushing for Maliki’s ouster.
Even though Vidal-Quadras, Stevenson and Casaca will not be serving in the incoming European Parliament as of July 1, the MEK will surely try to recruit more MEPs for its cause, including with new tools like the EIFA. Of course, whoever is approached by the MEK — and most MEPs will be approached if they haven’t already — would be wise to think twice about associating with an organization that attempts to minimize the acts of a group so murderous and fanatical that even al-Qaeda has declared it too extreme.
Photo: The European Iraqi Freedom Association’s (EIFA) June 11 press conference in Brussels featuring European members of parliament Stephen Hughes, Struan Stevenson, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, and Paulo Casaca.
(Photograph courtesy Annette Hawkins)
(Mojahedin English language paper April 1980)
(Mojahedin English Language paper April 1980)
(Mojahedin English Language paper June 1980)
Iran Interlink, May 28 2014: … The MEK and Saddamists have lost two key lobbyists in the new session of the European Parliament. Struan Stevenson (UK) threw in the towel and didn’t stand again. Alejo Vidal-Quadras (Spain) tried to garner the far right vote by creating the new Vox Party – which took less than 2% of the vote. Vidal-Quadras was exposed in the Spanish …
Elsa S. Vejo Destrella Digital (Digital Star), May 10 2014: … The question still remains unresolved and the experts bring to the fore the question of where does the MEK get all the money it costs to maintain this important network of contacts and support . According to Vidal-Quadras, solely from the Iranians in the diaspora, “some of them are very wealthy”. Although …
Eldar Mamedov, Lobelog FP, May 08 2014: … The good news is that MEK lobbying efforts against diplomacy with Iran are unlikely to succeed. Even with the extravagant funds the MEK has spent on endorsements by political elites, the group’s prominence in the EU is confined only to one part of the EP. The foreign policy decision-making bodies of the EU — the Council of the EU and …
Massoud Khodabandeh, Iranian.com, May 05 2014: … these anti-Iranian hardliners in the USA, headed by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, already failed in a provocative bid to bring the Mojahedin Khalq’s second-in-command Maryam Rajavi to the US to speak in Washington to coincide with the nuclear talks. Such a visit could have only one purpose; the hope that Iran would …