Robert Azzi, Concord monitor, February 03 2019:… Bolton is a longtime supporter of the Mujahedeen Khalq (MEK), a cultist Iranian dissident group that advocates for regime change in Iran. MEK, which was on our State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations from 1997 to 2012, is still suspected of the assassination of six Americans and the bombings of American companies in Iran. Pompeo is a well-known Islamophobe and supporter of “enhanced interrogation” techniques …
Robert Azzi: America, Iran, Venezuela: Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Last week, I got a thank-you card signed by a group of students from Somersworth High School with whom I spent time discussing Khaled Hosseini’s book, A Thousand Splendid Suns. They had read the novel with insight – kudos to their teacher – had prepared thoughtful questions in advance, and were interested in and prepared to go beyond the printed page to further their understanding of worlds far-removed from New Hampshire’s Seacoast.
It was fun; if only all adults – especially adults tasked with ensuring our security – were as curious and engaged.
Last week, before the Senate Intelligence Committee, CIA Director Gina Haspel and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, along with other senior intelligence officials, publicly discussed their assessment of national security threats, assessments that contradict several of President Donald Trump’s positions and assertions.
For example, Haspel said Iran is still in compliance with the Iran nuclear deal (from which Trump has unilaterally withdrawn America), while DNI Coats said that ISIS hasn’t been defeated and remains a strategic threat in Iraq and Syria. They testified that North Korea isn’t likely to either denuclearize or end its nuclear programs and, as Coats offered, that our national security is directly threatened by climate change.
Not one person suggested that America was confronting an existential crisis along its southern border.
Yet, in response to their presentation, President Trump tweeted that the intelligence officials (whom he appointed) were “extremely passive and naive,” that they should “go back to school.”
Such rhetoric unsettles allies, emboldens enemies.
In 2001, immediately after al-Qaida’s attacks on America, neo-conservatives, from Vice President Dick Cheney on down, realized that they could exploit the attack in order to advance their long-held imperialist dream of invading Iraq and re-making the Middle East.
They invaded Iraq in 2003 with disastrous consequences for which we, and the world, are still paying.
Unbelievably, these men are back in power today.
Today, sadly, these unreconstructed cheerleaders and apologists who were part of that first Orientalist adventure – John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and Elliott Abrams – are advancing regime change in Iran and Venezuela.
That troika, today known as Trump’s national security adviser, his secretary of state and his newly appointed special envoy to Venezuela, want to go to war.
It worked well before, didn’t it?
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Bolton is a longtime supporter of the Mujahedeen Khalq (MEK), a cultist Iranian dissident group that advocates for regime change in Iran. MEK, which was on our State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations from 1997 to 2012, is still suspected of the assassination of six Americans and the bombings of American companies in Iran.
Pompeo is a well-known Islamophobe and supporter of “enhanced interrogation” techniques. After the Boston Marathon attack Pompeo, in spite of evidence to the contrary, falsely suggested that American Muslims were “potentially complicit in these acts,” painting a target on the back of America’s Muslim population and marginalizing an entire community.
Abrams was convicted of lying to Congress during the Iran-Contra Affair for helping to organize illegal financing of Nicaragua’s Contra rebels (and pardoned by President George H.W. Bush). During the Reagan administration he tried to whitewash a massacre by U.S.-funded death squads in El Salvador of a thousand men, women and children. In 2002 the Observer reported that Abrams gave the green light to an attempted coup against Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez.
Many of the dictatorial regimes and death squads that have plagued Central and South America, including in Chile, Argentina, El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala have American – and Abrams’s – fingerprints on them and are directly related to the humanitarian crisis throughout the region.
We helped break them all.
Today, Abrams, with fellow regime-change advocates Bolton and Pompeo, stand together to further hegemonic interventionist interests while at the same time serving an ignorant authoritarian-wannabe whose sole interest is to exploit resentments and tensions to further his own power, political interests – and profits.
Pompeo recently began a speech in Cairo, ”In my office, I keep a Bible open on my desk to remind me of God and his word, and the truth.”
The truth is that the true evangelical calling of such rapacious men is not to serve God but to serve Mammon, to serve the narrow, imperialist and hegemonic interests of selfish and ignorant men.
“I’ve crossed paths since with men like him,” Hosseini writes in And the Mountains Echoed. “… What I have learned is that you dig a little and you find they’re all the same, give or take. Some are more polished, granted … but really they’re all unhappy little boys sloshing around in their own rage. They feel wronged. They haven’t been given their due. No one loved them enough. Of course they expect you to love them. They want to be held, rocked, reassured. But it’s a mistake to give it to them. They can’t accept it. They can’t accept the very thing they’re needing. They end up hating you for it.”
Today, it’s they who should “go back to school”; I recommend they go to Somersworth High School.
That would make me feel a lot safer.
(Robert Azzi, a photographer and writer who lives in Exeter, can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. His columns are archived at theotherazzi.wordpress.com.)
An Unholy Alliance: The Use of Terrorism According to John Bolton
Thierry Meyssan, Mint Press News, January 31 2019:… John Bolton’s links with the MEK date back to the Bush administration. They were strengthened by his presence – for a price of 40,000 dollars – during their annual meetings at Villepinte (France), in 2010 and 2017. Having become the National Security Advisor, he now unites the jihadists from Daesh and the loyal followers of Maryam Radjavi against their common objective.
John Bolton is carefully uniting an unholy alliance of terrorist groups who all share one goal: opposition to Iran
In 1978, President Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbignew Brzezinski, decided to use the Muslim Brotherhood against the Soviets, and sent Arab combatants to support the Afghan opposition against the Communist regime. Responding to a call for help from the Afghan government, the Red Army became bogged down in an unwinnable conflict.
In Afghanistan, the Muslim Brotherhood was not armed by the CIA, who were unable to obtain the authorization from Congress for an operation of that magnitude, but by Israel. In view of their success, the Arab-Afghans were later mobilized in many other theatres of operation. It followed, amongst other things, that the Brotherhood, armed both by Israel and Iraq, took a shot at the Syrian Arab Republic, in 1978-82. One thing leading to another, a representative of the Brotherhood was incorporated into the staff of NATO during the attack in Kosovo against Yugoslavia.
The position of the Muslim Brotherhood as auxiliary troops for NATO was canceled at the end of the Clinton presidency, but the collaboration of the Brotherhood with the CIA has never been terminated. It was clearly re-instated with the attack on Libya under the Obama presidency, where it furnished almost all of the ground troops for the Atlantic Alliance. One of their representatives was even incorporated into the U.S. National Security Council. Then, during the attack on Syria, NATO’s LandCom, situated in Izmir, coordinated the jihadist troops.
Since the Trump administration opposes on principle the use of terrorist groups by U.S. military, the moment arrived for the White House to redefine the role of the Muslim Brotherhood.
We do not yet know the new strategy defined by National Security Advisor John Bolton. However, several elements enable us to guess its general form.
At the beginning of 2018, U.S. Special Forces illegally stationed in Syria exfiltrated thousands of Daesh (ISIS) combatants overseas. In May 2018, General Yahya Rahim Safavi, military advisor to Ayatollah Khamenei, accused the U.S. of organizing the transfer of Daesh combatants to Afghanistan.
Currently, approximately 7,000 of them are still on Afghani soil. Contrary to their past position, they do not support the Taliban, who are currently opposed to all foreign presence, but now oppose them.
According to the spokesman for the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (in other words the Taliban), Qari Muhammad Yousuf Ahmadi,
The American invaders and their lackeys carried out a raid last night [12 January 2019] against a Mujahedin camp where members of Daesh were being held, situated in Pani Bus in the district of Jwand, Bâdghîs province. The joint enemy forces martyred two guards and left with 40 Daesh-affiliated prisoners. Apparently, the American invaders and their henchmen from the Kabul administration launched this raid in order to help the Daesh prisoners. Every time the Mujahedin of the Islamic Emirate [the Taliban] have fought Daesh, the American invaders have assisted Daesh and bombed Mujahedin positions. Exactly the same way that when Daesh was uprooted by the Mujahedin of Darzab, in the district of Jowzjan, and was about to be destroyed [last August], the American invaders and the Kabul administration jointly assisted 200 members of Daesh by helicopter.”
It was at this moment that the Combating Terrorism Center of the Military Academy of West Point published a historical study of the divergences between the Mujahedin during the war against the Soviets. This document noted that in 1989, during the retreat of the Red Army, and when Osama Bin Laden had returned to Saudi Arabia, certain young members of the Muslim Brotherhood questioned the laxism of their senior officers. They created the “Jalalabad School”, which was much more strict, and began to accuse various people of impiety and excommunicated them (takfir). This, they say, is the conflict that blew up again in 2014, provoking the split between al-Qaida and Daesh.
This flashback should not blind us to the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood continued to welcome not only the Taliban but all Afghani resistants, until the assassination of Ahmed Chah Massoud (himself an ex-member of the Muslim Brotherhood), on September 9, 2001 (two days before the attacks of New York and the Pentagon). For two decades, Afghanistan became the training ground for jihadists from all over the world, particularly the combatants from the Russian Caucasus. Today the Taliban are much more careful with their choice of allies and their friends. It is true that today they control 60 % of the territory. They no longer base themselves on theological grounds, but on nationalist criteria.
During the war against the Soviets, the Muslim Brotherhood were mainly aligned with ex-Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who was their representative in the country. On 22 September 2016, with the support of the Obama administration, he was awarded the pardon of the new Afghan state and was removed from the UN list of terrorists.
The arrival of Daesh in Afghanistan occurred at the time when the Trump administration had been trying – since July 2018 – to negotiate with the Taliban. Preliminary contacts took place in Qatar with ambassador Alice Wells, assistant to Mike Pompeo for Central Asia. The negotiations were headed by ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad in September and October, despite the anxiety of the Afghan government, which sent a representative but were not admitted. Khalilzad had fought alongside the Talibans, Pachtuns like himself, against the Soviets, before taking US citizenship. He was trained in neoconservatism and became ambassador to the UNO in 2007, when the Senate opposed the nomination of John Bolton.
The People’s Mujaheddin
Last week, the head of the People’s Mujaheddin (MEK) of Iran, Maryam Radjavi, traveled to Kabul on an official visit, from Tirana, where she lives. She met specifically with the President of the National Security Council and ex-ambassador to the United States, Hamdullah Mohib. Within the next few days, she should be traveling to Herat, in the district of Shindand, to establish a military base for her organization. According to the Pakistani newspaper Ummat, the Pentagon has already trained 2,000 of the People’s Mujahedin there, in October 2012.
Despite their apparent similarity in name, there is no connection between the Mujahedin (with one d) of the Muslim Brotherhood (who are Arabs and Sunnis) and the Mujaheddin (with two d’s) of the MEK (who are Persian). The only objective link between the two groups is that they have both been used by the United States and both practice terrorism.
As from 2013, the MEK has been transferred from Iraq to Albania with the support of the United States. A small town has been built for them by Israeli companies. However, on 23 June 2014, Maryam Radjavi, in a long speech given before 80,000 members of the sect and 600 Western personalities, spoke of her satisfaction that Iraq had been conquered by Daesh. We should remember that this victory had been organized with the help of General Ezzat Ibrahim al-Douri, ex-right-hand man for President Saddam Hussein, and as such, protector of the People’s Mujahedin.
John Bolton’s links with the MEK date back to the Bush administration. They were strengthened by his presence – for a price of 40,000 dollars – during their annual meetings at Villepinte (France), in 2010 and 2017. Having become the National Security Advisor, he now unites the jihadists from Daesh and the loyal followers of Maryam Radjavi against their common objective.
The most immediate of the targets of this terrorist is Iran, with whom Afghanistan shares a long frontier, hard to defend.
Thierry Meyssan is a political consultant, President-founder of the Réseau Voltaire (Voltaire Network). His latest work in French is Sous nos Yeux. Du 11-Septembre à Donald Trump (Right Before our Eyes. From 9/11 to Donald Trump).